Loading...

Statistical Consulting

//Statistical Consulting
Statistical Consulting 2019-05-15T20:15:49+00:00

AMSTAT Consulting’s Expertise

AMSTAT Consulting has become nationally recognized for providing data management and statistical analysis. Hundreds of thousands of successful clients cite these reasons for choosing to work with AMSTAT Consulting:

  • All of our principals have Ph.D. in statistics at leading universities including Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia.
  • They include nationally renowned scholars who are also talented professors.
  • They have extensive backgrounds in statistics and biostatistics and over 100 years of practical experience in quantitative methods.
  • They are experts in statistical analysis such as t-test, ANOVA, traditional regression, logistic regression, MANOVA, factor analysis, cluster analysis, survival analysis, time series analysis, canonical correlations, discriminant analysis, and more advanced statistical techniques such as structural equation modeling (SEM), hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), and path analysis.
  • They are experts in statistical programming languages such as SAS, SPSS, STATA, HLM, Mplus, R, and Access.
  • Our fees usually pale in comparison to the savings and/or additional profits that our work produces for our clients.
  • Over 90% of our clients request our assistance more than once, as our clients are almost universally happy with our different brand of consulting.
  • We are more reasonably priced than most other consultants offering statistical consulting.
  • We offer personalized, comprehensive, and friendly support during and after your consultation with us.
  • We offer ultra-fast turnaround times, often completing sections within 4-5 business days.
  • We are members in good standing of the Statistical Consulting section of the American Statistical Association.

PhD in Statistics at Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia

All of our principals have PhD in statistics at leading universities including Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia.

PhD in Statistics at Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia

All of our principals have PhD in statistics at leading universities including Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia.

Nationally Renowned Scholars

They include nationally renowned scholars who are also talented professors.

Talented Professors

They include nationally renowned scholars who are also talented professors.

Extensive Backgrounds in Statistics & Biostatistics

They have extensive backgrounds in statistics and biostatistics and over 100 years of practical experience in quantitative methods.

Over 100 Years of Practical Experience in Quantitative Methods

They have extensive backgrounds in statistics and over 100 years of practical experience in quantitative methods.

Experts in Statistical Programming Languages

They are experts in statistical programming languages such as SAS, SPSS, HLM, Mplus, STATA, R, and Access.

Experts in Statistical Programming Languages

They are experts in statistical programming languages such as SAS, SPSS, HLM, Mplus, STATA, R, and Access.

Our Services

We are happy to provide the help you need at any or all of the following steps in earning the data-based answers you request:

  • Establishing and operationalizing your hypotheses and research questions
  • Providing ample instruction on the methods used
  • Inputting, organizing, and cleaning the data
  • Implementing the statistical analyses
  • Testing reliability (such as Cronbach’s alpha, test-retest reliability, split-half reliability, and inter-rater reliability) and validity (such as content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, internal validity, and external validity)
  • Writing up all results, including APA tables and figures
  • Providing syntax and raw output file
  • Explaining the results
  • Allowing unlimited e-mail and phone support to ensure that you completely understand the results of the analysis
  • Conducting two rounds of incidental statistics (i.e., if you would like additional statistics)
  • Preparing an effective PowerPoint Presentation.

AMSTAT Consulting is dedicated to detecting and correcting corrupt or inaccurate records from a record set, table, or database. The process of data cleaning includes data auditing, workflow specification, workflow execution, post-processing, and controlling.

We can use popular methods. Those include parsing, data transformation, duplicate elimination, and statistical methods. By analyzing the data using the values of mean, standard deviation, range, and clustering algorithms, we can find values that are unexpected and thus erroneous.

We can examine any standardized residual greater than about 3 in absolute value, Hat element greater than 3p/n (p=k+1, k degrees of freedom), a Cook’s distance > 1, and Mahalanobis’s distance for case. We run Outlier Analysis such as a run-sequence plot,  a scatter plot, a histogram, and a box plot.

We can test reliability (such as Cronbach’s alpha, test-retest reliability, split-half reliability, and inter-rater reliability) and validity (such as content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, internal validity, and external validity).

We can design and perform the required statistical analyses.  Here is a sample of some of the analytical tools with which we are familiar:

  •  T-test
  • ANOVA
  • Correlation Analysis
  • Traditional Regression
  • Multiple Regression Analysis
  • Logistic Regression
  • MANOVA
  • MANCOVA
  • Factor Analysis
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Time Series Analysis
  • Survival Analysis
  • Canonical Correlations
  • Discriminant Analysis
  • Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
  • Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM)
  • Path Analysis
  • Bayesian analysis
  • Descriptive Statistics
  • Discrepancy Analysis
  • Friedman two-way ANOVA (analysis of variance)
  • Futility Analysis
  • Hierarchical Linear Modeling
  • Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
  • Interim Analysis
  • Item Analysis
  • Kruskal-Wallace one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
  • Latent Variable Analysis
  • Longitudinal Growth Modeling
  • Mann-Whitney U
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Multidimensional Scaling
  • Multilevel Path Modeling/Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling
  • Multivariate Logistic Regression
  • Power Analysis
  • Raking Data
  • Tau-U Analysis
  • Transformations for normality or linearity
  •  Trend Analysis
  • Wilcoxon signed-rank test

We have expertise in virtually every statistical and qualitative software package, including but not limited to:

  • SAS
  • SPSS
  • STATA
  • HLM
  • Mplus
  • R
  • Access

Dr. Vincent Salyers, Dean and Professor, MacEwan University

“I have worked closely with AMSTAT Consulting on the data analysis/results of two research projects so feel as though I am knowledgeable about their expertise. On all accounts, the company provided me with reliable statistical analysis and results that I could translate into publishable format. They are conscientious experts who provide keen insights into appropriate statistical analysis given various data sets. I highly recommend them for your statistical support needs!”

Dr. Vincent Salyers, Dean and Professor

Dr. Raj Singhal, MD., Research Director of Pain Management, Phoenix Children’s Hospital

“Dr. Ann has been instrumental in helping with our statistical needs. In addition to her professionalism, she has been prompt and thorough with all of our requests. Dr. Ann’s work is impeccable, and I would recommend her services to anyone in need of assistance with statistical methods or interpretation. We plan on using Dr. Ann for all of our future needs, and I am thrilled to have been introduced to her.”

Dr. Raj Singhal, MD., Research Director of Pain Management

Dr. Zamir S. Brelvi, MD, PhD., CEO, EndoLogic

“We have been very pleased with working with AMSTAT Consulting. The service was custom tailored and on time completion. The statistical report was detailed with excellent graphics. The cost of the services was affordable for a start-up company such as EndoLogic! Dr. Ann is very detail oriented and likes to know the project thoroughly that is being analyzed.”

Dr. Zamir S. Brelvi, MD, PhD., CEO

Dr. Haritha Boppana, MD, DHA, GHS Greenville Memorial Hospital

“I am a physician and was in need of statistical analysis of research data. I found AMSTAT Consulting on online search. Dr. Ann called me and explained the process involved in data analysis. Dr. Ann was always very prompt, helpful, intelligent and took time explaining the various tests used in conducting data analysis. Thank you so much!! I look forward to working with you in the future.”

Dr. Haritha Boppana, MD, D

Prof. Mohamed Toufic El Hussein, Mount Royal University

“Extremely professional. Attends to your project needs with skills and expertise. Pays attention to all details. Offers suggestions and recommendation for better and more effective use of your data. Creative and sincere. Thank you very much.”

Prof. Mohamed Toufic El Hussein, Mount Royal University

Dr. Nancy Allen, PhD., Curriculum and Technology Consultant

“My project required the analysis of a complex survey that required a great deal of help in organizing the data and analyses. In addition, the project required a quick turn-around. AMSTAT Consulting asked all the right questions, made realistic and helpful suggestions, and completed the project in a timely manner. They were professional and helpful throughout the process. I highly recommend them.”

Dr. Nancy Allen, PhD., Curriculum and Technology Consultant

Google Ratings: 5/5

Google Ratings: 5/5

Facebook Ratings: 5/5

Facebook Ratings: 5/5

Trust Pilot Ratings: 5/5

Trust Pilot Ratings: 5/5

AMSTAT Consulting is one of the most reliable companies I have ever used. The consultants at AMSTAT consulting always do a good job on time and on budget. Their knowledge of statistics makes them fabulous statisticians. Their innovation and expertise make for a potent combination.

Jennifer High, 5-star Google Review

They came through with all they promised and their guarantee to satisfy the customer came through every time in my transactions. Their employees are very professional and friendly. I will use them in the future without questions.

AMSTAT Consulting provides efficient and accurate statistical consulting services. They worked through my research questions to create a professionally finished document. Their personal and professional assistance made the analysis a fast and fairly painless part of the process for me. Their services are worth every penny.

Nothing was a problem and the project management was done so well. I highly recommend them and will use them for any future works.

Hayes Dolores, 5-star Google Review

I highly recommend AMSTAT Consulting. They possess the total package: excellent credentials, strong statistical and data mining skills, the initiative to anticipate client needs, compelling and concise communications, and a results-driven mindset. They have led numerous projects that have helped our company maximize marketing efforts. In all, the quality has been superior and their client-service attitudes are tremendous. Their data analysis, writing, editing, project management, positive attitude and continuous assistance were tremendous.

Carey Williams, 5-star Facebook Review

I began using AMSTAT Consulting recently. Their product caters for all my advisory needs. I particularly rely on automated report creation. It has helped me structure my advisory processes, improve my client’s profitability, decision making and overall accountability to strategies we agree on. Would recommend to all!

We are one of the leading business groups, and when we look for data management and data analysis services for our business, we come across with AMSTAT Consulting. One of our friends suggested this data analysis services to us. When we spoke with them, their representative satisfied us with their service and we hired them. After hiring them, we feel that it is a reliable company and we will utilize this company again.

I have been a satisfied user of AMSTAT Consulting for many years. AMSTAT Consulting has dramatically enhanced the data analysis services available to run my business.

A real high-class team. Thank you for a beautifully done project.

Sophia Johnson, 5-star Facebook Review

AMSTAT consulting is a worldwide data analysis corporation that uses exclusive data, innovative analysis, technology, and industry expertise to drive organizations and individuals around the world by transforming knowledge into information that helps makes informed business and personal decisions. They are really good at work, and I am highly stratified with their work. Because of their best services, I always recommended this company services to others also.

We are in search of data analysis service for our businesses. When we search on Google, we come to across AMSTAT Consulting. From their site, we find out they provide exactly the same services which we require. So we plan to hire this company. Hiring of them really proves a good decision for us. Thanks to AMSTAT Consulting for their best services which they provide us!!

Alexander Thomas, 5-star Facebook Review

The assistance and technical advice are given by AMSTAT Consulting and team. They are first class in their attitude and ability. We give you 5 stars in every respect. Well done and thank you indeed.

William Miller, 5-star Facebook Review

Great staff, great program. The main benefit is the level of support and service provided. AMSTAT Consulting has been extremely helpful through the whole process, thanks, guys!

Sophia Hayat, 5-star Facebook Review

I have worked closely with AMSTAT Consulting on the data analysis/results of two research projects so feel as though I am knowledgeable about their expertise. On all accounts the company provided me with reliable statistical analysis and results that I could translate into publishable format. They are conscientious experts who provide keen insights into appropriate statistical analysis given various data sets. I highly recommend them for your statistical support needs!

Extremely professional. Attends to your project needs with skills and expertise. Pays attentions to all details. Offers suggestions and recommendation for better and more effective use of your data. Creative and sincere. Thank you very much.

Mohamed Hussein, 5-star Trust Pilot Review

A+++ in my eyes. They helped us with regression analysis and we will use them in the future without questions. They are very professional.

They delivered outstanding service and we are thoroughly pleased with their work. Will be using them again in the future!

The service is very professional and I am very happy about receiving the paper before the due time. I am happy to pass on AMSTAT Consulting’s services to others I know who are in the same situation.

Harvard Medical School logo

HMSTH Logo

Massachusetts General Hospital Home

Image

Apple logo black.svg

Google

HP logo 2012.svg

Image

National Institutes of Health (NIH) - Turning Discovery into Health

Partners HealthCare logo.svg

Silicon Valley Bank logo.svg

MSKCC logo.jpgWeill Cornell Medicine

Mayo Clinic

Logo of the University of Pennsylvania Health System and Penn Medicine

UC Berkeley

ImageImage

OSU Medical Center logo

Image

PCH

Greenville Health System

Cancer Treatment Centers of America

INTERNATIONAL VITAMIN CORPORATION

Baptist Health South Florida

Image result for hilton head hospital

Image

MET Laboratories – Testing Lab for Product Safety, Electromagnetic Compatibility, Environmental Simulation

Surgery Center Of Beaufort

Endologic

ESCO Logo

Mather Hospital

St. Charles

Georgetown

Baptist Memorial Rehabilitation Hospital

Trio Health, Inc. logo

MSI

Emblem of the United States Department of the Army.svg

HDLogoNew3

TRUE.COM

Image

University of Massachusetts Amherst seal.png

Image

University of Minnesota block M and wordmark

Monmouth University

WSU logo

Image

Gannon University

Chamberlain University, College of Nursing and Health Professionals

University of Nevada, Las Vegas seal.svg

Dr. David Fetterman
Dr. David FettermanAdvisory Board (Fetterman & Associates, President)
EDUCATION

Ph.D., Stanford University
Master’s Degree, Stanford University
Master’s Degree, Stanford University

EXPERIENCE

Stanford University, Professor
School of Medicine, Stanford University, Director of Evaluation

HONORS (selected)

American Educational Research Association Research on Evaluation Distinguished Scholar Award, 2013
American Evaluation Association Advocacy and Use Evaluation Award, 2014
Lazarsfield Award for Contributions to Evaluation Theory, American Evaluation Association, 2000
Mensa Education and Research Foundation Award for Excellence, 1990.
Myrdal Award for Cumulative Contributions to Evaluation Practice, American Evaluation Association, 1995
Outstanding Higher Education Professional, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, 2008
Who’s Who in America, 1990, 1995-1996, 1999, 2008-2012
Who’s Who in American Education, 1989 90, 1995-96, 2003
Who’s Who in Science and Engineering, 2010, 2011
Who’s Who in the World, 2011, 2012, 2013

PROJECTS (selected)

$15 Million Digital Divide Project, Hewlett-Packard Philanthropy and Education
W. K. Kellogg Foundation
Tobacco Prevention, Minority Initiative Sub-recipient Grant Office, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff
Tsholofelo Community, South Africa
Corte Madera, Portola Valley School District, CA
Family and Children Services, Palo Alto, CA
Ministry of Health and Jimma University, Ethiopia
BUILD, Palo Alto
Case Method, Columbia School of Journalism
Digital Media Center, Knight Foundation
Knight New Media Center, Knight Foundation
Te Puni Kokiri, Ministry of Maori Development, New Zealand
National Institute of Multimedia Education, Japan
Knight Foundations, Western Knight Center for Specialized Journalism
Mosaic’s Project, California State University
Arkansas Department of Education
One East Palo Alto. City Revitalization Project Hewlett Foundation
National Indian Child Welfare Association. Intertribal Council of Michigan, Hannahville Indian Community
Independent Development Trust, Cape Town, South Africa
California Arts Council

BOOKS (selected)

Fetterman, D.M. (2013). Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages: Hewlett-Packard’s $15 Million Race Toward Social Justice. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (See Stanford Social Innovations site: http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/empowerment_evaluation_in_the_digital_villages_hewlett_packards_15_million)
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (2014) (eds.) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M., Rodriguez-Campos, L., and Zukowski, A. (in press). Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation: Stakeholder Involvement Approaches to Evaluation. New York: Guilford Publications.
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (2015). Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. and Wandersman, A. (2005). Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice. New York: Guilford Publications. (Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M. (2001). Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., Wandersman, A. (Eds.) (1996). Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment and Accountability. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.) (1993). Speaking the Language of Power: Communication, Collaboration, and Advocacy. London, England: Falmer Press. (Preview.)

CHAPTERS AND ARTICLES (selected – over 100)

Fetterman, D.M. (in press). Empowerment Evaluation. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. and Ravitz, J. (in press). Evaluation Capacity Building. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (in press). Empowerment Evaluation: Linking Theories, Principles, and Concepts to Practical Steps. In Secolsky, C. and Denison, D.B. (eds.) Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.
Fetterman, D.M. (2015). Empowerment Evaluation. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition.
Mansh, M., White, W., Gee-Tong, L., Lunn, M., Obedin-Maliver, J., Stewart, L., Goldsmith, E., Brenman, S., Tran, E., Wells, M., Fetterman, D.M., Garcia, G. (2015). Sexual and Gender Minority Identity Disclosure During Undergraduate Medical Education: “In the Closet” in Medical School. Academic Medicine, 90(5):634-644.
Wang JY, Lin H, Lewis PY, Fetterman DM, Gesundheit N. (2015). Is a career in medicine the right choice? The impact of a physician shadowing program on undergraduate premedical students. Acad Med. May, 90(5):629-33. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000615
White, W., Brenman, S., Paradis, E., Goldsmith, E.S., Lunn, M.R., Obedin-Maliver, J., Stewart, L., Tran, E., Wells, M., Chamberlain, L.J., Fetterman, D.M., and Garcia, G. (2015). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Patient Care: Medical Students’ Preparedness and Comfort. Teaching and Learning in Medicine: An International Journal. Volume, 27, Issue 3: 254-263
Obedin-Maliver, J., Goldsmith, E.S., Stewart, L., White, W., Tran, E., Brenman, S., Wells, M., Fetterman, D.M., Garcia, G., Lunn, M.R. (2011). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender-Related Content in Undergraduate Medical Education. JAMA, 306(9):971-977.
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (2015). Empowerment evaluation is a systematic way of thinking: A response to Michael Patton Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment, evaluation capacity building, and accountability. Evaluation and Program Planning 52 (2015) 10–14
Fetterman, D.M. (2011). Empowerment Evaluation and Accreditation Case Examples: California Institute of Integral Studies and Stanford University. In Secolsky, C. and Denison, D.B. (eds.) Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
Fetterman, D.M., Deitz, J., and Gesundheit, N. (2010). Empowerment evaluation: A collaborative approach to evaluating and transforming a medical school curriculum. Academic Medicine, 85(5):813-820.
Fetterman, D.M. (2009). Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: Using a Critical Friend to Improve the Clerkship Experience. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação. Rio je Janeiro, 17(63):197-204.
Fetterman, D.M. (2004). Empowerment Evaluation’s Technological Tools of the Trade. Harvard Family Research Project. The Evaluation Exchange, X 3, p. 8-9.
Fetterman, D.M. (2003). Empowerment Evaluation Strikes a Responsive Chord. In S. Donaldson & Scriven, M. (Eds.) Evaluating social programs and problems: Visions for the new millennium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fetterman, D.M. and Bowman, C. (2001). Experiential Education and Empowerment Evaluation: Mars Rover Educational Program Case Example. Journal of Experiential Education.
Fetterman, D.M. (2002). Web surveys to Digital Movies: Technological Tools of the Trade. Educational Researcher, 31(6):29-37 or http://aera.net
Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Teaching in the Virtual Classroom at Stanford University. The Technology Source.
Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Webs of Meaning: Computer and Internet Resources for Educational Research and Instruction. Educational Researcher, 27(3):22-30.
Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Learning with and about technology: A middle school nature area. Meridian, 1(1)
Fetterman, D.M. (1996). Empowerment Evaluation: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. In Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (eds.) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (1996). Conclusion: Reflections on Emergent Themes and Next Steps. In Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (eds.) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (1996). Videoconferencing On-Line: Enhancing Communication Over the Internet. Educational Researcher, 25(4)
Fetterman, D.M. (1995). In Response to Dr. Daniel Stufflebeam’s: “Empowerment Evaluation, Objectivist Evaluation, and Evaluation Standards: Where the Future of Evaluation Should Not Go and Where It Needs to Go,” Evaluation Practice, June 1995, 16(2):179-199.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Gifted and Talented Education Program Evaluation. In Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). The Terman Study. In Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Keeping Research on Track. New Directions for Program Evaluation. No. 63, Fall. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 103-105.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Empowerment Evaluation. Presidential Address. Evaluation Practice, 15(1):1-15.
Fetterman, D.M. (1992). Hevrah: Our Intellectual Community. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 23(4): 271-274.
Fetterman, D.M. (1992) Evaluate Yourself. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
Fetterman, D.M. (1991). Evaluation in Multi-Site and Multi-Focus Projects. Revitalizing Rural America: New Strategies for the Nineties. Georgia Center for Continuing Education. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia.
Fetterman, D.M. (1990). Health and Safety Issues: Colleges Must Take Steps to Avert Serious Problems. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 21, A48.
Fetterman, D.M. (1989). Anthropology Can Make a Difference. In Trueba, H., G. Spindler, and Spindler, L. (Eds.) What Do Anthropologists Have to Say About Dropouts? New York, NY: Falmer Press, 1989.
Fetterman, D.M. (1988). Stanford Special Review on Health and Safety Phase II: A Report on Allegations. Internal Audit Department. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Fetterman, D.M. (1988). Gifted and Talented Education. In Gorton, R.A., Schneider, G.T., and Fisher, J.C. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of School Administration and Supervision. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). Operational Auditing in a Teaching Hospital: A Cultural Approach, Internal Auditor, 43(2):48-54.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). Evaluating Organizational Culture in a Teaching Hospital: The Use of Cultural Concepts and Techniques. In K. Sedgwick (Ed.), Association of College and University Auditors. Logan, Utah: Utah State University.
Fetterman, D.M. (1982). Ibsen’s Baths: Reactivity and Insensitivity (A misapplication of the treatment-control design in a national evaluation). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4 (3):261-279.
Fetterman, D.M. (1981). Protocol and Publication: Ethical Obligations. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 7(1):82-83.

RADIO INTERVIEWS (recent at: http://www.davidfetterman.com/RadioInterviews.htm)

Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), KAZI FM, Houston, Texas, March 29, 2013.
Chronicle of Philanthropy article about evaluation and nonprofit survival (Chronicle), WPFM FM, Washington, D.C. March 25, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), Kathryn Zox Show, March 13, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), Money Matters Network, Host Stu Taylor, January 28, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), WKXL-AM, Concord, New Hampshire, Host Bill Kearney, January 17, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), WPHM-AM Detroit, Host Paul Miller, January 14, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), Business Matters Radio, Host Thomas White, January 14, 2013.

BLOGS (selected)

Fetterman, D.M. (2014) David Fetterman on Google Glass Part I: Redefining Communications. AEA365. American Evaluation Association. http://aea365.org/blog/david-fetterman-on-google-glass-part-i-redefining-communications/ (April 17.)
Fetterman, D.M. (2014) David Fetterman on Google Glass Part II: Using Glass as an Evaluation Tool. AEA365. American Evaluation Association. http://aea365.org/blog/david-fetterman-on-google-glass-part-ii-using-glass-as-an-evaluation-tool/ (April 18.)
Fetterman, D.M. (2013). In These Uncertain Times, Charities Need a Survival Plan. The Chronicle of Philanthropy. March 10. http://philanthropy.com/article/In-These-Uncertain-Times/137741/
Fetterman, D.M. (2013). Surviving the Fiscal Cliff: The one thing every nonprofit should do in the face of federal tax increases and spending cuts. Stanford Social Innovation Review. http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/surviving_the_fiscal_cliff (January).
Fetterman, D.M. (2012). Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages. Stanford Social Innovation Review. http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/empowerment_evaluation_in_the_digital_villages_hewlett_packards_15_million (December)
Fetterman, D.M. (2012). Corporate Philanthropy Tackles the Digital Divide. Stanford Social Innovation Review. http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/corporate_philanthropy_tackles_the_digital_divide (November)

ENCYCLOPEDIA (selected): The International Encyclopedia of Education and Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence

Dr. Ann E. K. Um
Dr. Ann E. K. UmPresident and CEO
EDUCATION

Doctorate Degree, Columbia University
Master’s Degree, Stanford University
Master’s Degree, Columbia University

EXPERIENCE

Harvard Medical School, DFCI, Research Data Manager
Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Data Manager
The University of Texas, Assistant Professor
Harvard University, Harvard Innovation Labs, Experfy, Instructor
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Advisor
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Human Studies Review Board

PUBLICATIONS (selected)

Autonomy Support, Self-Concept, and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM Verlag, 2010.
Motivation and Mathematics Achievement: A Structural Equation Analysis, Saarbrucken. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM Verlag, 2008.
Motivation and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis. Michigan, Ann Arbor: ProQuest, 2006.
Motivation and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis (doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, New York, 2005.

PRESENTATIONS (selected)

Motivation and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis, National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2005.
Comparing Eighth Grade Diagnostic Test Results for Korean and American Students, National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, Illinois, 2003.

Relative Risk (RR) of Lung Cancer 

February 20th, 2019|2 Comments

The purpose of this study was to compare the difference in relative risk (RR) of lung cancer between the intervention and control groups. The hypothesis was: H1: The intervention group will have an increase in relative risk [...]

The Difference in Blood Pressure Between Patients with Cancer and Patients without Cancer

January 20th, 2019|0 Comments

AMSTAT Consulting examined the difference in blood pressure between patients with cancer and patients without cancer. The research question being tested was: RQ1. Is there a significant difference in blood pressure between patients with [...]

The Impact of Manager’s Leadership on The Strategic Management of Organizations

December 2nd, 2018|2 Comments

The purpose of this study was to measure 1) if managers’ transformational style of leadership significantly affects the strategic management of organizations, and 2) if their transactional style of leadership significantly affects the strategic [...]

The Impact of Banking Fees on Financial Performance

November 1st, 2018|1 Comment

The purpose of the study was to measure the impact of banking fees on financial performance. The hypothesis was the following: H1: Banking fees significantly affect financial performance. We performed a regression analysis to [...]

The Impact of Internet Use on Perceived Performance in Firms

October 20th, 2018|1 Comment

The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of internet use on perceived performance in retail and professional service firms and age differences in internet usage. The hypotheses being tested were: H1:  Internet use [...]

The Effect of Compound D-600 on Gluconeogenesis

September 10th, 2018|0 Comments

The purpose of this study was to examine if there is a significant effect of compound D-600 (methoxyverapamil) on gluconeogenesis. The hypothesis being tested was: H1: There is a significant effect of compound D-600 [...]

The Difference in Bending Stiffness and Bending Strength

August 10th, 2018|0 Comments

A causal-comparative quantitative research design was used to measure the difference among the 2.0mm RP and 2.0mm SP in bending stiffness, bending strength, and bending structural stiffness. The hypothesis being tested was: H1: There is [...]

The Impact of Bank Size and Bank Age on Financial Performance

July 1st, 2018|0 Comments

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of bank size and bank age on financial performance. The hypotheses being tested were: Hypothesis 1: There is a significant impact of bank size [...]

The Difference between Allergic and Non-allergic Patients

June 5th, 2018|0 Comments

The purpose of the study was to measure if there are significantly different responses to treatments between Allergic and Non-allergic patients. The hypothesis was: H1. There are significantly different responses to treatments between Allergic and [...]

The Impact of Bullying on Depression

May 2nd, 2018|0 Comments

AMSTAT Consulting measured the impact of bullying on depression. The hypothesis was as follows: H1. Bullying significantly affects depression. We performed a regression analysis to examine the hypothesis. The p-value of .02 is significant at [...]

The Impact of Painkillers on Chronic Pain

April 1st, 2018|0 Comments

AMSTAT Consulting measured the impact of painkillers on chronic pain. The hypothesis was as follows: H1. Painkillers significantly affect chronic pain. We performed a regression analysis to examine the hypothesis. The p-value of .009 is [...]

The Effect of Firm Size on Performance of Firms

March 6th, 2018|0 Comments

The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of firm size on the performance of firms. The hypothesis was as follows: H1: There is a significant effect of firm size on the [...]

The Effect of Marketing Strategy on Sales Performance

February 3rd, 2018|0 Comments

The purpose of the study was to measure the effect of marketing strategy on sales performance. The hypothesis was as follows: H1. Marketing strategy significantly affects sales performance. A regression analysis was performed to [...]

If you are a student, get a price and submit your order here. If you are a business, contact us.

Business Days
If you don't know the answer, please contact us.
$ 0.00
Please send your data to info@amstatisticalconsulting.com.
Proceed to Safe Payment

Join The 300,000+ Satisfied Customers Today

Let’s Get Started!