Loading...

Qualitative Analysis

//Qualitative Analysis
Qualitative Analysis 2019-05-15T20:18:06+00:00

AMSTAT Consulting’s Expertise

AMSTAT Consulting has become nationally recognized for helping researchers and doctoral students analyze the qualitative data. Hundreds of thousands of successful clients cite these reasons for choosing to work with AMSTAT Consulting:

  • All of our principals have Ph.D. at leading universities including Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia.
  • They include nationally renowned scholars who are also talented professors.
  • They have over 100 years of practical experience in qualitative methods.
  • They are experts in using qualitative data analysis software such as NVivo 8 and 9, Nud*ist, HyperResearch, and Atlas.
  • They are adept with scholarly databases such as JSTOR, Ebsco, ProQuest, Scopus, Questia, Blackwell Synergy, ScienceDirect, and many others.
  • Our fees usually pale in comparison to the savings and/or additional profits that our work produces for our clients.
  • Over 90% of our clients request our assistance more than once, as our clients are almost universally happy with our different brand of consulting.
  • We are more reasonably priced than most other consultants.
  • We offer personalized, comprehensive, and friendly support during and after your consultation with us.
  • We offer ultra-fast turnaround times, often completing sections within 4-5 business days.

PhD in Statistics at Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia

All of our principals have PhD in statistics at leading universities including Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia.

PhD in Statistics at Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia

All of our principals have PhD in statistics at leading universities including Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia.

Nationally Renowned Scholars

They include nationally renowned scholars who are also talented professors.

Talented Professors

They include nationally renowned scholars who are also talented professors.

Over 100 Years of Practical Experience in Qualitative Methods

They have over 100 years of practical experience in qualitative methods.

Over 100 Years of Practical Experience in Qualitative Methods

They have over 100 years of practical experience in qualitative methods.

Experts in Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software

They are experts in using qualitative data analysis software such as NVivo 8 and 9, Nud*ist, HyperResearch, and Atlas.

Experts in Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software

They are experts in using qualitative data analysis software such as NVivo 8 and 9, Nud*ist, HyperResearch, and Atlas.

Our Services

We are happy to provide the help you need at any or all of the following steps in earning the data-based answers you request:

  • Establishing and operationalizing your research questions
  • Providing ample instruction on the methods used
  • Coding, thematizing, and providing reporting of findings for a study
  • Identifying themes and sub-themes
  • Coding documents in order to count the word-phrase clusters
  • Creating a word-phrase cluster in the form of classified conceptual categories for the purpose of counting those conceptually categorized words or phrases
  • Addressing specific subthemes that the thematic constructs have
  • Providing numerical frequencies and standard scores for each master theme and sub-theme
  • Writing up all results, including APA tables and figures
  • Explaining the results
  • Allowing unlimited e-mail and phone support to ensure that you completely understand the results of the analysis
  • Preparing an effective PowerPoint Presentation.

All surveys rely on directly asking people questions to get information. A survey must be concerned with who and how many will be asked questions (sampling), when and how often (design), and processing, analysis, and interpretation of data.

Survey purposes and methods fall on a continuum. Some surveys can have far-reaching, generalizable effects, and their methods must be scientific.
All surveys consist of (1) questions and (2) instructions, and they make sense only in the context of (3) sampling and design, (4) data processing and analysis, (5) pilot testing, (6) response rate, and (7) reporting results.

We are experts in determining sample size requirements, explaining survey designs, transcribing interviews, coding, and classifying data.

We are dedicated to helping our clients analyze their qualitative data utilizing a number of different methodologies.

Meta-Analysis

Meta-Analysis is a methodology employed to synthesize the outcomes of various studies related to the same topic or outcome measure. We can achieve the integration of research findings through qualitative means.

Qualitative meta-analysis follows the same replicable procedures of a quantitative meta-analysis; however, it is interpretive rather than aggregative. It is critical to define the domain of research and establish criteria for including studies in the review.

Phenomenology

Standardized as a phenomenological research methodology by Moustakas (1994), the modified van Kaam (1959) method involves understanding the essence, meaning, and structure of an individual’s lived experiences. AMSTAT Consulting uses this methodology to look for patterns and trends by identifying shared beliefs.

Analytic Induction

We are experts in observing events, stating a hypothesis, observing additional events, and evaluating whether the new observations follow the hypothesis. We can ease the process for anyone who uses analytic induction.

Logical or Matrix Analysis

Logical or matrix analysis emphasizes the processes of reasoning while analytic induction relies on observations. Thus, how the answer is found is as important as what the answer actually is.

Dr. Vincent Salyers, Dean and Professor, MacEwan University

“I have worked closely with AMSTAT Consulting on the data analysis/results of two research projects so feel as though I am knowledgeable about their expertise. On all accounts, the company provided me with reliable data analysis and results that I could translate into publishable format. They are conscientious experts who provide keen insights into appropriate data analysis given various data sets. I highly recommend them for your data support needs!”

Dr. Vincent Salyers, Dean and Professor

Dr. Raj Singhal, MD., Research Director of Pain Management, Phoenix Children’s Hospital

“Dr. Ann has been instrumental in helping with our statistical needs. In addition to her professionalism, she has been prompt and thorough with all of our requests. Dr. Ann’s work is impeccable, and I would recommend her services to anyone in need of assistance with methods or interpretation. We plan on using Dr. Ann for all of our future needs, and I am thrilled to have been introduced to her.”

Dr. Raj Singhal, MD., Research Director of Pain Management

Dr. Zamir S. Brelvi, MD, PhD., CEO, EndoLogic

“We have been very pleased with working with AMSTAT Consulting. The service was custom tailored and on time completion. The report was detailed with excellent graphics. The cost of the services was affordable for a start-up company such as EndoLogic! Dr. Ann is very detail oriented and likes to know the project thoroughly that is being analyzed.”

Dr. Zamir S. Brelvi, MD, PhD., CEO

Dr. Haritha Boppana, MD, DHA, GHS Greenville Memorial Hospital

“I am a physician and was in need of data analysis of research data. I found AMSTAT Consulting on online search. Dr. Ann called me and explained the process involved in data analysis. Dr. Ann was always very prompt, helpful, intelligent and took time explaining the various tests used in conducting data analysis. Thank you so much!! I look forward to working with you in the future.”

Dr. Haritha Boppana, MD, D

Prof. Mohamed Toufic El Hussein, Mount Royal University

“Extremely professional. Attends to your project needs with skills and expertise. Pays attention to all details. Offers suggestions and recommendation for better and more effective use of your data. Creative and sincere. Thank you very much.”

Prof. Mohamed Toufic El Hussein, Mount Royal University

Dr. Nancy Allen, PhD., Curriculum and Technology Consultant

“My project required the analysis of a complex survey that required a great deal of help in organizing the data and analyses. In addition, the project required a quick turn-around. AMSTAT Consulting asked all the right questions, made realistic and helpful suggestions, and completed the project in a timely manner. They were professional and helpful throughout the process. I highly recommend them.”

Dr. Nancy Allen, PhD., Curriculum and Technology Consultant

Google Ratings: 5/5

Google Ratings: 5/5

Facebook Ratings: 5/5

Facebook Ratings: 5/5

Trust Pilot Ratings: 5/5

Trust Pilot Ratings: 5/5

They came through with all they promised and their guarantee to satisfy the customer came through every time in my transactions. Their employees are very professional and friendly. I will use them in the future without questions.

Nothing was a problem and the project management was done so well. I highly recommend them and will use them for any future works.

Hayes Dolores, 5-star Google Review

I highly recommend AMSTAT Consulting. They possess the total package: excellent credentials, strong skills, the initiative to anticipate client needs, compelling and concise communications, and a results-driven mindset. They have led numerous projects that have helped our company maximize marketing efforts. In all, the quality has been superior and their client-service attitudes are tremendous. Their data analysis, writing, editing, project management, positive attitude and continuous assistance were tremendous.

Carey Williams, 5-star Facebook Review

We are one of the leading business groups, and when we look for data management and data analysis services for our business, we come across with AMSTAT Consulting. One of our friends suggested this data analysis services to us. When we spoke with them, their representative satisfied us with their service and we hired them. After hiring them, we feel that it is a reliable company and we will utilize this company again.

I have been a satisfied user of AMSTAT Consulting for many years. AMSTAT Consulting has dramatically enhanced the data analysis services available to run my business.

A real high-class team. Thank you for a beautifully done project.

Sophia Johnson, 5-star Facebook Review

AMSTAT consulting is a world wide data analysis corporation that uses exclusive data, innovative analysis, technology, and industry expertise to drive organizations and individuals around the world by transforming knowledge into information that helps makes informed business and personal decisions. They are really good at work, and I am highly stratified with their work. Because of their best services, I always recommended this company services to others also.

We are in search of data analysis service for our businesses. When we search on Google, we come to across AMSTAT Consulting. From their site, we find out they provide exactly the same services which we require. So we plan to hire this company. Hiring of them really proves a good decision for us. Thanks to AMSTAT Consulting for their best services which they provide us!!

Alexander Thomas, 5-star Facebook Review

The assistance and technical advice are given by AMSTAT Consulting and team. They are first class in their attitude and ability. We give you 5 stars in every respect. Well done and thank you indeed.

William Miller, 5-star Facebook Review

Great staff, great program. The main benefit is the level of support and service provided. AMSTAT Consulting has been extremely helpful through the whole process, thanks, guys!

Extremely professional. Attends to your project needs with skills and expertise. Pays attentions to all details. Offers suggestions and recommendation for better and more effective use of your data. Creative and sincere. Thank you very much.

They delivered outstanding service and we are thoroughly pleased with their work. Will be using them again in the future!

The service is very professional and I am very happy about receiving the paper before the due time. I am happy to pass on AMSTAT Consulting’s services to others I know who are in the same situation.

Harvard Medical School logo

HMSTH Logo

Image

Massachusetts General Hospital Home

Google

HP logo 2012.svg

Image

National Institutes of Health (NIH) - Turning Discovery into Health

Partners HealthCare logo.svg

Silicon Valley Bank logo.svg

MSKCC logo.jpgWeill Cornell Medicine

Mayo Clinic

Logo of the University of Pennsylvania Health System and Penn Medicine

UC Berkeley

Image

Image

OSU Medical Center logo

Image

PCH

Greenville Health System

Cancer Treatment Centers of America

INTERNATIONAL VITAMIN CORPORATION

Baptist Health South Florida

Image result for hilton head hospital

Image

MET Laboratories – Testing Lab for Product Safety, Electromagnetic Compatibility, Environmental Simulation

Surgery Center Of Beaufort

Endologic

ESCO Logo

Mather Hospital

St. Charles

Georgetown

Baptist Memorial Rehabilitation Hospital

Trio Health, Inc. logo

MSI

Emblem of the United States Department of the Army.svg

HDLogoNew3

TRUE.COM

Image

University of Massachusetts Amherst seal.png

Image

University of Minnesota block M and wordmark

Monmouth University

WSU logo

Image

Gannon University

Chamberlain University, College of Nursing and Health Professionals

University of Nevada, Las Vegas seal.svg

Dr. David Fetterman
Dr. David FettermanAdvisory Board (Fetterman & Associates, President)
EDUCATION

Ph.D., Stanford University
Master’s Degree, Stanford University
Master’s Degree, Stanford University

EXPERIENCE

Stanford University, Professor
School of Medicine, Stanford University, Director of Evaluation

HONORS (selected)

American Educational Research Association Research on Evaluation Distinguished Scholar Award, 2013
American Evaluation Association Advocacy and Use Evaluation Award, 2014
Lazarsfield Award for Contributions to Evaluation Theory, American Evaluation Association, 2000
Mensa Education and Research Foundation Award for Excellence, 1990.
Myrdal Award for Cumulative Contributions to Evaluation Practice, American Evaluation Association, 1995
Outstanding Higher Education Professional, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, 2008
Who’s Who in America, 1990, 1995-1996, 1999, 2008-2012
Who’s Who in American Education, 1989 90, 1995-96, 2003
Who’s Who in Science and Engineering, 2010, 2011
Who’s Who in the World, 2011, 2012, 2013

PROJECTS (selected)

$15 Million Digital Divide Project, Hewlett-Packard Philanthropy and Education
W. K. Kellogg Foundation
Tobacco Prevention, Minority Initiative Sub-recipient Grant Office, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff
Tsholofelo Community, South Africa
Corte Madera, Portola Valley School District, CA
Family and Children Services, Palo Alto, CA
Ministry of Health and Jimma University, Ethiopia
BUILD, Palo Alto
Case Method, Columbia School of Journalism
Digital Media Center, Knight Foundation
Knight New Media Center, Knight Foundation
Te Puni Kokiri, Ministry of Maori Development, New Zealand
National Institute of Multimedia Education, Japan
Knight Foundations, Western Knight Center for Specialized Journalism
Mosaic’s Project, California State University
Arkansas Department of Education
One East Palo Alto. City Revitalization Project Hewlett Foundation
National Indian Child Welfare Association. Intertribal Council of Michigan, Hannahville Indian Community
Independent Development Trust, Cape Town, South Africa
California Arts Council

BOOKS (selected)

Fetterman, D.M. (2013). Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages: Hewlett-Packard’s $15 Million Race Toward Social Justice. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (See Stanford Social Innovations site: http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/empowerment_evaluation_in_the_digital_villages_hewlett_packards_15_million)
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (2014) (eds.) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M., Rodriguez-Campos, L., and Zukowski, A. (in press). Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation: Stakeholder Involvement Approaches to Evaluation. New York: Guilford Publications.
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (2015). Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. and Wandersman, A. (2005). Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice. New York: Guilford Publications. (Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M. (2001). Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., Wandersman, A. (Eds.) (1996). Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment and Accountability. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.) (1993). Speaking the Language of Power: Communication, Collaboration, and Advocacy. London, England: Falmer Press. (Preview.)

CHAPTERS AND ARTICLES (selected – over 100)

Fetterman, D.M. (in press). Empowerment Evaluation. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. and Ravitz, J. (in press). Evaluation Capacity Building. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (in press). Empowerment Evaluation: Linking Theories, Principles, and Concepts to Practical Steps. In Secolsky, C. and Denison, D.B. (eds.) Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.
Fetterman, D.M. (2015). Empowerment Evaluation. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition.
Mansh, M., White, W., Gee-Tong, L., Lunn, M., Obedin-Maliver, J., Stewart, L., Goldsmith, E., Brenman, S., Tran, E., Wells, M., Fetterman, D.M., Garcia, G. (2015). Sexual and Gender Minority Identity Disclosure During Undergraduate Medical Education: “In the Closet” in Medical School. Academic Medicine, 90(5):634-644.
Wang JY, Lin H, Lewis PY, Fetterman DM, Gesundheit N. (2015). Is a career in medicine the right choice? The impact of a physician shadowing program on undergraduate premedical students. Acad Med. May, 90(5):629-33. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000615
White, W., Brenman, S., Paradis, E., Goldsmith, E.S., Lunn, M.R., Obedin-Maliver, J., Stewart, L., Tran, E., Wells, M., Chamberlain, L.J., Fetterman, D.M., and Garcia, G. (2015). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Patient Care: Medical Students’ Preparedness and Comfort. Teaching and Learning in Medicine: An International Journal. Volume, 27, Issue 3: 254-263
Obedin-Maliver, J., Goldsmith, E.S., Stewart, L., White, W., Tran, E., Brenman, S., Wells, M., Fetterman, D.M., Garcia, G., Lunn, M.R. (2011). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender-Related Content in Undergraduate Medical Education. JAMA, 306(9):971-977.
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (2015). Empowerment evaluation is a systematic way of thinking: A response to Michael Patton Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment, evaluation capacity building, and accountability. Evaluation and Program Planning 52 (2015) 10–14
Fetterman, D.M. (2011). Empowerment Evaluation and Accreditation Case Examples: California Institute of Integral Studies and Stanford University. In Secolsky, C. and Denison, D.B. (eds.) Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
Fetterman, D.M., Deitz, J., and Gesundheit, N. (2010). Empowerment evaluation: A collaborative approach to evaluating and transforming a medical school curriculum. Academic Medicine, 85(5):813-820.
Fetterman, D.M. (2009). Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: Using a Critical Friend to Improve the Clerkship Experience. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação. Rio je Janeiro, 17(63):197-204.
Fetterman, D.M. (2004). Empowerment Evaluation’s Technological Tools of the Trade. Harvard Family Research Project. The Evaluation Exchange, X 3, p. 8-9.
Fetterman, D.M. (2003). Empowerment Evaluation Strikes a Responsive Chord. In S. Donaldson & Scriven, M. (Eds.) Evaluating social programs and problems: Visions for the new millennium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fetterman, D.M. and Bowman, C. (2001). Experiential Education and Empowerment Evaluation: Mars Rover Educational Program Case Example. Journal of Experiential Education.
Fetterman, D.M. (2002). Web surveys to Digital Movies: Technological Tools of the Trade. Educational Researcher, 31(6):29-37 or http://aera.net
Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Teaching in the Virtual Classroom at Stanford University. The Technology Source.
Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Webs of Meaning: Computer and Internet Resources for Educational Research and Instruction. Educational Researcher, 27(3):22-30.
Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Learning with and about technology: A middle school nature area. Meridian, 1(1)
Fetterman, D.M. (1996). Empowerment Evaluation: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. In Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (eds.) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (1996). Conclusion: Reflections on Emergent Themes and Next Steps. In Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (eds.) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (1996). Videoconferencing On-Line: Enhancing Communication Over the Internet. Educational Researcher, 25(4)
Fetterman, D.M. (1995). In Response to Dr. Daniel Stufflebeam’s: “Empowerment Evaluation, Objectivist Evaluation, and Evaluation Standards: Where the Future of Evaluation Should Not Go and Where It Needs to Go,” Evaluation Practice, June 1995, 16(2):179-199.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Gifted and Talented Education Program Evaluation. In Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). The Terman Study. In Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Keeping Research on Track. New Directions for Program Evaluation. No. 63, Fall. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 103-105.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Empowerment Evaluation. Presidential Address. Evaluation Practice, 15(1):1-15.
Fetterman, D.M. (1992). Hevrah: Our Intellectual Community. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 23(4): 271-274.
Fetterman, D.M. (1992) Evaluate Yourself. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
Fetterman, D.M. (1991). Evaluation in Multi-Site and Multi-Focus Projects. Revitalizing Rural America: New Strategies for the Nineties. Georgia Center for Continuing Education. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia.
Fetterman, D.M. (1990). Health and Safety Issues: Colleges Must Take Steps to Avert Serious Problems. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 21, A48.
Fetterman, D.M. (1989). Anthropology Can Make a Difference. In Trueba, H., G. Spindler, and Spindler, L. (Eds.) What Do Anthropologists Have to Say About Dropouts? New York, NY: Falmer Press, 1989.
Fetterman, D.M. (1988). Stanford Special Review on Health and Safety Phase II: A Report on Allegations. Internal Audit Department. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Fetterman, D.M. (1988). Gifted and Talented Education. In Gorton, R.A., Schneider, G.T., and Fisher, J.C. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of School Administration and Supervision. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). Operational Auditing in a Teaching Hospital: A Cultural Approach, Internal Auditor, 43(2):48-54.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). Evaluating Organizational Culture in a Teaching Hospital: The Use of Cultural Concepts and Techniques. In K. Sedgwick (Ed.), Association of College and University Auditors. Logan, Utah: Utah State University.
Fetterman, D.M. (1982). Ibsen’s Baths: Reactivity and Insensitivity (A misapplication of the treatment-control design in a national evaluation). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4 (3):261-279.
Fetterman, D.M. (1981). Protocol and Publication: Ethical Obligations. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 7(1):82-83.

RADIO INTERVIEWS (recent at: http://www.davidfetterman.com/RadioInterviews.htm)

Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), KAZI FM, Houston, Texas, March 29, 2013.
Chronicle of Philanthropy article about evaluation and nonprofit survival (Chronicle), WPFM FM, Washington, D.C. March 25, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), Kathryn Zox Show, March 13, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), Money Matters Network, Host Stu Taylor, January 28, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), WKXL-AM, Concord, New Hampshire, Host Bill Kearney, January 17, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), WPHM-AM Detroit, Host Paul Miller, January 14, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), Business Matters Radio, Host Thomas White, January 14, 2013.

BLOGS (selected)

Fetterman, D.M. (2014) David Fetterman on Google Glass Part I: Redefining Communications. AEA365. American Evaluation Association. http://aea365.org/blog/david-fetterman-on-google-glass-part-i-redefining-communications/ (April 17.)
Fetterman, D.M. (2014) David Fetterman on Google Glass Part II: Using Glass as an Evaluation Tool. AEA365. American Evaluation Association. http://aea365.org/blog/david-fetterman-on-google-glass-part-ii-using-glass-as-an-evaluation-tool/ (April 18.)
Fetterman, D.M. (2013). In These Uncertain Times, Charities Need a Survival Plan. The Chronicle of Philanthropy. March 10. http://philanthropy.com/article/In-These-Uncertain-Times/137741/
Fetterman, D.M. (2013). Surviving the Fiscal Cliff: The one thing every nonprofit should do in the face of federal tax increases and spending cuts. Stanford Social Innovation Review. http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/surviving_the_fiscal_cliff (January).
Fetterman, D.M. (2012). Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages. Stanford Social Innovation Review. http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/empowerment_evaluation_in_the_digital_villages_hewlett_packards_15_million (December)
Fetterman, D.M. (2012). Corporate Philanthropy Tackles the Digital Divide. Stanford Social Innovation Review. http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/corporate_philanthropy_tackles_the_digital_divide (November)

ENCYCLOPEDIA (selected): The International Encyclopedia of Education and Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence

Dr. Ann E. K. Um
Dr. Ann E. K. UmPresident and CEO
EDUCATION

Doctorate Degree, Columbia University
Master’s Degree, Stanford University
Master’s Degree, Columbia University

EXPERIENCE

Harvard Medical School, DFCI, Research Data Manager
Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Data Manager
The University of Texas, Assistant Professor
Harvard University, Harvard Innovation Labs, Experfy, Instructor
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Advisor
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Human Studies Review Board

PUBLICATIONS (selected)

Autonomy Support, Self-Concept, and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM Verlag, 2010.
Motivation and Mathematics Achievement: A Structural Equation Analysis, Saarbrucken. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM Verlag, 2008.
Motivation and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis. Michigan, Ann Arbor: ProQuest, 2006.
Motivation and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis (doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, New York, 2005.

PRESENTATIONS (selected)

Motivation and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis, National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2005.
Comparing Eighth Grade Diagnostic Test Results for Korean and American Students, National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, Illinois, 2003.

See Our Work

Join The 300,000+ Satisfied Customers Today

Let’s Get Started!