Loading...

Evaluation

//Evaluation
Evaluation 2020-01-21T19:33:53+00:00

AMSTAT Consulting’s Expertise

AMSTAT Consulting provides fast and reliable credential evaluation services for numerous local, state, and federal government entities, schools, community, non-profit organizations and business clients. Hundreds of thousands of successful clients cite these reasons for choosing to work with AMSTAT Consulting:

  • All of our principals have Ph.D. at leading universities including Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia.
  • They include nationally renowned evaluation experts.
  • They have over 100 years of practical experience in evaluation and performance measurement.
  • Our fees usually pale in comparison to the savings and/or additional profits that our work produces for our clients.
  • Over 90% of our clients request our assistance more than once, as our clients are almost universally happy with our different brand of evaluation.
  • We are more reasonably priced than most other companies offering health evaluations.
  • We offer personalized, comprehensive, and friendly support during and after your consultation with us.
  • We offer ultra-fast turnaround times.

Ph.D. at Leading Universities Including Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia

All of our principals have Ph.D. at leading universities including Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia.

Ph.D. at Leading Universities Including Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia

All of our principals have Ph.D. in statistics at Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia.

Internationally Renowned Figures in Evaluation

They include internationally renowned figures in evaluation.

Internationally Renowned Figures in Evaluation

They include internationally renowned figures in evaluation.

Over 100 Years of Practical Experience in Evaluation

They have over 100 years of practical experience in evaluation.

Over 100 Years of Practical Experience in Evaluation

They have over 100 years of practical experience in evaluation.

Our Services

AMSTAT Consulting can conduct several types of evaluations. Some of them include the following:

Formative Evaluation

AMSTAT Consulting can:

  • Ensure that a program or program activity is feasible, appropriate, and acceptable before it is fully implemented.
  • Conduct it when a new program or activity is being developed or when an existing one is being adapted or modified.
  • Examine whether the proposed program elements are likely to be needed, understood, and accepted by the population you want to reach.
  • Examine the extent to which an evaluation is possible, based on the goals and objectives.
  • Allow for modifications to be made to the plan before full implementation begins.
  • Maximize the likelihood that the program will succeed.

Process Evaluation

AMSTAT Consulting can:

  • Determine whether program activities have been implemented as intended.
  • Evaluate how well the program is working, the extent to which the program is being implemented as designed, and whether the program is accessible and acceptable to its target population.
  • Provide an early warning for any problems that may occur.
  • Allow programs to monitor how well their program plans and activities are working.
  • Track program information related to Who, What, When and Where questions:
    • To whom did you direct program efforts?
    • What has your program done?
    • When did your program activities take place?
    • Where did your program activities take place?
    • What are the barriers/facilitators to implementation of program activities?

Outcome Evaluation

AMSTAT Consulting can:

  • Measure the degree to which the program is having an effect on the target population’s behaviors.
  • Tell whether the program is being effective in meeting it’s objectives.
  • Some questions we may address with an outcome evaluation include:
    • Were medical providers who received intensive STD training more likely to effectively counsel, screen and treat patients than those who did not?
    • Did the implementation of STD counseling in community-based organizations result in changes in knowledge, attitudes, and skills among the members of the target population?
    • Did the program have any unintended (beneficial or adverse) effects on the target population(s)?
    • Do the benefits of the STD activity justify a continued allocation of resources?

Economic Evaluation

AMSTAT Consulting can:

  • Examine what resources are being used in a program and their costs (direct and indirect) compared to outcomes.
  • Provide program managers and funders a way to assess cost relative to effects. “How much bang for your buck.”

Impact Evaluation

AMSTAT Consulting can:

  • Examine the degree to which the program meets its ultimate goal.
  • Provide evidence for use in policy and funding decisions.

We are happy to provide the help you need at any or all of the following steps in earning the answers you request:

  • developing a detailed program evaluation management plan;
  • reviewing program documents and records;
  • conducting pre-program development (Needs Assessment) evaluation;
  • conducting implementation (Process or Formative) evaluation;
  • conducting impact (Performance, Outcome or Summative) evaluation;
  • conducting site and classroom observations;
  • conducting focus group interviews;
  • conducting surveys;
  • leading site evaluation team meetings;
  • inputting, organizing, and cleaning the data;
  • implementing data analysis;
  • developing written evaluation reports;
  • presenting evaluation results to governing board

AMSTAT Consulting is dedicated to offering the following professional services:

  • Independent program evaluation services for grants
  • Performance measurement for corporations
  • Government contracting activities
  • Statistical and other types of quantitative analysis and support
  • Other types of administrative functions

Program evaluation is a tool with which to demonstrate accountability to an array of stakeholders who may include funding sources, policymakers, state, and local agencies implementing the program, and community leaders. AMSTAT Consulting can:

  • Engage stakeholders
  • Describe the program
  • Focus the evaluation
  • Gather credible evidence
  • Justify conclusions
  • Ensure the use of evaluation findings and share lessons learned

Keep your big data indefinitely.

We are experts in specifying the initial survey based on your research interest. We can choose the various options of scales such as:

  • Nominal Scales
  • Ordinal Scales
  • Interval Scales
  • Ratio Scales

Personalize experiences with machine learning and predictive analytics software.

We are experts in devising the sampling plan. We can choose the various options such as:

Probability Sampling

  • Simple Random Sampling
  • Stratified Random Sampling
  • Cluster Sampling

Nonprobability Sampling

  • Quota Sampling
  • Purposive Sampling
  • Snowball Sampling

Advanced analytics optimizes your supply chain.

We can design and perform the required statistical analyses.  Here is a sample of some of the analytical tools with which we are familiar:

  •  T-test
  • ANOVA
  • Correlation Analysis
  • Traditional Regression
  • Multiple Regression Analysis
  • Logistic Regression
  • MANOVA
  • MANCOVA
  • Factor Analysis
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Time Series Analysis
  • Survival Analysis
  • Canonical Correlations
  • Discriminant Analysis
  • Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
  • Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM)
  • Path Analysis
  • Bayesian analysis
  • Descriptive Statistics
  • Discrepancy Analysis
  • Friedman two-way ANOVA (analysis of variance)
  • Futility Analysis
  • Hierarchical Linear Modeling
  • Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
  • Interim Analysis
  • Item Analysis
  • Kruskal-Wallace one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
  • Latent Variable Analysis
  • Longitudinal Growth Modeling
  • Mann-Whitney U
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Multidimensional Scaling
  • Multilevel Path Modeling/Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling
  • Multivariate Logistic Regression
  • Power Analysis
  • Raking Data
  • Tau-U Analysis
  • Transformations for normality or linearity
  •  Trend Analysis
  • Wilcoxon signed-rank test

We have expertise in virtually every statistical and qualitative software package, including but not limited to:

  • SAS
  • SPSS
  • STATA
  • HLM
  • Mplus
  • R
  • Access

Performance measurement and improvement are systematic processes by which an organization continuously and consistently tracks and applies important program and operations data for the purpose of optimizing its ability to efficiently and effectively advance its desired social impact. The most powerful performance measurement systems are typically a core responsibility of an organization’s own staff, who integrate program, financial and organizational data to measure an organization’s progress and success.

AMSTAT Consulting can conduct performance measurement to enable an organization to continuously learn and improve, which helps it to achieve better results. The metrics tracked should be derived from an organization’s intended impact and theory of change—what the organization is holding itself accountable for achieving and how to get there. By measuring performance, we can:

  • Track progress towards and be held accountable for their intended impact and theory of change
  • Ensure programs or initiatives are implemented as designed
  • Learn about ways to achieve even better results by analyzing insights
  • Communicate progress and successes internally and externally to staff, beneficiaries, funders, peer organizations, and the broader community
  • Over time, gain insights about program effectiveness and what works and, if appropriate, prepare for rigorous program evaluations

There are five key steps to a strong performance measurement and improvement process. We can:

  • Define: Clarify your definition of success and the critical questions or decisions that performance measurement will help inform.
    • Crystallize your intended impact and theory of change.
    • Derive clear, prioritized metrics from these that cover program, financial, and organizational data.
    • Design and develop a data system and data-collection process to systematically gather and analyze this data at appropriate intervals.
  • Measure: Collect information, verify and validate it, and track it in the data system.
  • Learn: Analyze data and generate reports to identify insights and propose ways to improve.
  • Improve: Decide which improvements will strengthen the organization’s success and begin implementing them.
  • Share: Decide how what you have learned may help others in your organization and in the greater field, and share your metrics and results.

Good leadership and management are essential to organizational development, performance, and sustainability. An organization succeeds because of what it does (a shared commitment to accomplish something useful and important) and how it does it (the way it functions, decides, evaluates, adapts, and delegates).

Factors determining how an organization does its work or accomplishes its objectives:

  • Effectiveness and functioning of individuals at all levels of the organization
  • Management systems supporting their work
  • Organizational culture
  • Adequacy of human and financial resources

Organizational performance always includes some element of customer satisfaction. One evaluates what an organization does in relation to the goals and objectives it has established. Evaluators should, therefore, define measures or indicators in relation to the specific long- and short-range objectives set by the organization, many of which are presented in this database. We can:

  • Use a standard set of criteria based on national or international norms and standards
  • Develop indicators for each management area and component in collaboration with the organization as part of an exercise to review and strengthen its management systems
    • This approach involves an assessment to determine the baseline stage of development of the organization.

Use big data to make informed decisions

Evaluation encourages us to examine the operations of a program, including which activities take place, who conducts the activities, and who is reached as a result. In addition, evaluation will show how faithfully the program adheres to implementation protocols. Through program evaluation, we can determine whether activities are implemented as planned and identify program strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.

AMSTAT Consulting provides a variety of specialized evaluation services in health. They include:

  • Tobacco prevention
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Children and family services
  • Healthcare ethics
  • Biostatistical studies
  • Clinical trial design and methodology
  • Medical education
  • Biostatistical consulting
  • Clinical program evaluation
  • Performance measurement
  • Process improvement

Call Us Now At: (301) 800-0038 

Join The 300,000+ Satisfied Customers Today

If You Want To Set Up A Specific Time To Discuss Your Project, Schedule A Free Consultation! 

Contact us now!
Schedule a Free Consultation

Dr. Zamir S. Brelvi, MD, PhD., CEO, EndoLogic

“We have been very pleased with working with AMSTAT Consulting. The service was custom tailored and on time completion. The statistical report was detailed with excellent graphics. The cost of the services was affordable for a start-up company such as EndoLogic! Dr. Ann is very detail oriented and likes to know the project thoroughly that is being analyzed.”

Dr. Zamir S. Brelvi, MD, PhD., CEO

Dr. Raj Singhal, MD., Research Director of Pain Management, Phoenix Children’s Hospital

“Dr. Ann has been instrumental in helping with our statistical needs. In addition to her professionalism, she has been prompt and thorough with all of our requests. Dr. Ann’s work is impeccable, and I would recommend her services to anyone in need of assistance with statistical methods or interpretation. We plan on using Dr. Ann for all of our future needs, and I am thrilled to have been introduced to her.”

Dr. Raj Singhal, MD., Research Director of Pain Management

Dr. Vincent Salyers, Dean and Professor, Gonzaga University

“I have worked closely with AMSTAT Consulting on the data analysis/results of two research projects so feel as though I am knowledgeable about their expertise. On all accounts, the company provided me with reliable statistical analysis and results that I could translate into publishable format. They are conscientious experts who provide keen insights into appropriate statistical analysis given various data sets. I highly recommend them for your statistical support needs!”

Dr. Vincent Salyers, Dean and Professor

Dr. Haritha Boppana, MD, DHA, GHS Greenville Memorial Hospital

“I am a physician and was in need of statistical analysis of research data. I found AMSTAT Consulting on online search. Dr. Ann called me and explained the process involved in data analysis. Dr. Ann was always very prompt, helpful, intelligent and took time explaining the various tests used in conducting data analysis. Thank you so much!! I look forward to working with you in the future.”

Dr. Haritha Boppana, MD, DHA

Prof. Mohamed Toufic El Hussein, Mount Royal University

“Extremely professional. Attends to your project needs with skills and expertise. Pays attention to all details. Offers suggestions and recommendation for better and more effective use of your data. Creative and sincere. Thank you very much.”

Prof. Mohamed Toufic El Hussein

Dr. Nancy Allen, PhD., Curriculum and Technology Consultant

“My project required the analysis of a complex survey that required a great deal of help in organizing the data and analyses. In addition, the project required a quick turn-around. AMSTAT Consulting asked all the right questions, made realistic and helpful suggestions, and completed the project in a timely manner. They were professional and helpful throughout the process. I highly recommend them.”

Dr. Nancy Allen, PhD.

AMSTAT Consulting is one of the most reliable companies I have ever used. The consultants at AMSTAT consulting always do a good job on time and on budget. Their knowledge of statistics makes them fabulous statisticians. Their innovation and expertise make for a potent combination.

Jennifer High, 5-star Google Review

They came through with all they promised and their guarantee to satisfy the customer came through every time in my transactions. Their employees are very professional and friendly. I will use them in the future without questions.

AMSTAT Consulting provides efficient and accurate statistical consulting services. They worked through my research questions to create a professionally finished document. Their personal and professional assistance made the analysis a fast and fairly painless part of the process for me. Their services are worth every penny.

Nothing was a problem and the project management was done so well. I highly recommend them and will use them for any future works.

Hayes Dolores, 5-star Google Review

I highly recommend AMSTAT Consulting. They possess the total package: excellent credentials, strong statistical and data mining skills, the initiative to anticipate client needs, compelling and concise communications, and a results-driven mindset. They have led numerous projects that have helped our company maximize marketing efforts. In all, the quality has been superior and their client-service attitudes are tremendous. Their data analysis, writing, editing, project management, positive attitude and continuous assistance were tremendous.

Carey Williams, 5-star Facebook Review

I began using AMSTAT Consulting recently. Their product caters for all my advisory needs. I particularly rely on automated report creation. It has helped me structure my advisory processes, improve my client’s profitability, decision making and overall accountability to strategies we agree on. Would recommend to all!

We are one of the leading business groups, and when we look for data management and data analysis services for our business, we come across with AMSTAT Consulting. One of our friends suggested this data analysis services to us. When we spoke with them, their representative satisfied us with their service and we hired them. After hiring them, we feel that it is a reliable company and we will utilize this company again.

I have been a satisfied user of AMSTAT Consulting for many years. AMSTAT Consulting has dramatically enhanced the data analysis services available to run my business.

A real high-class team. Thank you for a beautifully done project.

Sophia Johnson, 5-star Facebook Review

AMSTAT consulting is a worldwide data analysis corporation that uses exclusive data, innovative analysis, technology, and industry expertise to drive organizations and individuals around the world by transforming knowledge into information that helps makes informed business and personal decisions. They are really good at work, and I am highly stratified with their work. Because of their best services, I always recommended this company services to others also.

We are in search of data analysis service for our businesses. When we search on Google, we come to across AMSTAT Consulting. From their site, we find out they provide exactly the same services which we require. So we plan to hire this company. Hiring of them really proves a good decision for us. Thanks to AMSTAT Consulting for their best services which they provide us!!

Alexander Thomas, 5-star Facebook Review

The assistance and technical advice are given by AMSTAT Consulting and team. They are first class in their attitude and ability. We give you 5 stars in every respect. Well done and thank you indeed.

William Miller, 5-star Facebook Review

Great staff, great program. The main benefit is the level of support and service provided. AMSTAT Consulting has been extremely helpful through the whole process, thanks, guys!

AMSTAT consulting is best in working. They have skilled persons who are always ready to help their customer. About AMSTAT consulting I get suggestions from one of my friends. He says to me that the services of this company are best and I must try them once. After my suggestion, I get in touch with him, and after talking with him I feel that my friend was quite right. Thanks to AMSTAT consulting for their best services.

My experience with AMSTAT consulting was brief but sweet because I had my dissertation quite written, but I needed some final touches and guidance on the analysis to reach final approval. I carried out my study on leadership and a series of variables in the workplace (commitment, commitment, satisfaction, etc.) and although I started with a fairly simple method plan, my study evolved in some way with the guidance of my very ambitious president to the point where I needed to use SEM to direct my RQs.

Elizabeth Williams, 5-star Facebook Review

It was really a good experience to work with AMSTAT consulting. They are good at working and have an expert team. I take their services 2 years back and they did their job on time and with quality. Their team members are polite and experienced. I always am grateful to them for their services which they provide to me. Thanks for the work they provide for me.

Sophia Johnson, 5-star Facebook Review

Thanks to everyone in AMSTAT consulting. But especially to their head as it was a great help. I came on board with an expectation in mind, and let me tell you that she was the best. I understand that they work with hundreds of clients every year, but I really felt taken care of as well. My experience with AMSTAT consulting was a breath of fresh air and I will recommend them to all my professional academic friends and family.

Jennifer Manglonton, 5-star Facebook Review

I signed up for hourly consulting services with AMSTAT consulting less than a week before Christmas last year. From the first day, AMSTAT consulting team was cheerful, positive and professional. What I liked the most about working with AMSTAT consulting was the way they made a seamless transition between specific and detailed comments about my writing (such as punctuation and syntax errors) to very broad and comprehensive comments (it really made me think why I chose certain examples for my dissertation).

AMSTAT consulting is a global professional services firm committed to achieving sustainable results in partnership with its clients. They bring a wealth of experience in strategy, operations, advisory services, technology, and analysis to drive lasting and measurable results in the medical care, higher education, life sciences and business sectors. Through focus, passion, and collaboration, they provide guidance to support organizations as they face the change that is transforming their industries and businesses.

Amanda Jensen, 5-star Facebook Review

Their enthusiasm, proactivity, and willingness to go beyond to excel are the highlights. It is good to work with AMSTAT consulting. Other activities and frequent lunches in the team, the outdoor trips sponsored by the company are rejuvenating. It was really a very good experience to work with people of AMSTAT consulting. I always get in touch with them for further services.

Fantastic! Highly recommend AMSTAT Consulting to any business. The customer advice was awesome. Very friendly and willing to listen to my questions and give me the answers I need to move forward in my business. Thank you AMSTAT Consulting!

I have worked closely with AMSTAT Consulting on the data analysis/results of two research projects so feel as though I am knowledgeable about their expertise. On all accounts the company provided me with reliable statistical analysis and results that I could translate into publishable format. They are conscientious experts who provide keen insights into appropriate statistical analysis given various data sets. I highly recommend them for your statistical support needs!

Extremely professional. Attends to your project needs with skills and expertise. Pays attentions to all details. Offers suggestions and recommendation for better and more effective use of your data. Creative and sincere. Thank you very much.

Mohamed Hussein, 5-star Trust Pilot Review

They have been doing a tremendous job on our requests. They are turning things around quickly, coming up with approaches and suggestions on their own and are truly patterning with me on different initiatives. I am deeply appreciative of all their effort and engagement.

We were very impressed with their outstanding performance. They have done a very good job. I have been somewhat impressed that they programmed the analysis very well. Their work concerning motivation and physician performance has significant implications for medicine nationally. They are hard-working consultants with a genuine interest in statistical consulting. They are responsible and get their work done on time. On a personal level, they are pleasant to work with. I highly recommend AMSTAT Consulting’s service to any researcher.

I highly recommend AMSTAT Consulting. They possess the total package – excellent credentials, strong statistical and data mining skills, the initiative to anticipate client needs, compelling and concise communications, strong client management skills, and a results-driven mindset. They have led numerous projects that have helped our company maximize research efforts. In all, the quality has been superior, and their client-service attitudes are tremendous.

Amazing experience. Had an outline for a scheduling tool we were trying to create, and Ann gave suggestions and completed the project perfectly.

Andrzej Szczepaniak, 5-star Trust Pilot Review

They came through with all they promised and their guarantee to satisfy the customer came through every time in my transactions. They helped us with a regression analysis and we will use them in the future without questions. Their employees are very professional and friendly. A+++ in our eyes.

Mark Bakacs, 5-star Manta Review

They delivered outstanding service and we are thoroughly pleased with their work. Will be using them again in the future!

The service is very professional and I am very happy about receiving the paper before the due time. I am happy to pass on AMSTAT Consulting’s services to others I know who are in the same situation.

Amy Gilmore, 5-star Manta Review

They did a great job on regression analysis. This provided great insight for me and will continue to help me make better decisions. I am confident in saying that they have helped move me forward.

I worked with the folks at AMSTAT Consulting on this project. Their performance was exemplary. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting are very punctual in completing their tasks. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting are open in working with any team member and perform their work diligently. They are very professional and courteous. We were impressed with their work output and performance. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting pick up new methodologies and work functions at a fast pace. I recommend AMSTAT Consulting most highly and without reservation and feel the folks at AMSTAT Consulting are very competent and display an excellent, strong work ethic.

AMSTAT Consulting helped to do statistical analysis. This was a big task since data analysis was on a large scale and over a thousand people were being followed. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting performed several analyses using SAS and SPSS. The database forms contained many types of data fields and required a good understanding of this population. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting such as Dr.Ann E. K. Um were proficient in implementing the statistical analysis using SAS. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting did more than we had expected. We are very happy with their work. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting such as Dr. Ann E. K. Um are experts in Statistics. I would recommend you give AMSTAT Consulting a try.

We enjoyed working with AMSTAT Consulting on this project. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting such as Dr. Ann E.K.Um are bright, goal oriented and highly motivated. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting not only aided us in our final product but also in our understanding of the applications of statistical analysis. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting impressed us. I strongly recommend AMSTAT Consulting to all my collesgues.

Call Us Now At: (301) 800-0038 

Join The 300,000+ Satisfied Customers Today

If You Want To Set Up A Specific Time To Discuss Your Project, Schedule A Free Consultation! 

Contact us now!
Schedule a Free Consultation

Harvard Medical School logo

Massachusetts General Hospital logo

Apple logo black.svg

Google

Image result for Hewlett packard

Silicon Valley Bank logo.svg

HMSTH Logo

Image

National Institutes of Health (NIH) - Turning Discovery into Health

Weill Cornell Medicine

Partners HealthCare logo.svg

Logo of the University of Pennsylvania Health System and Penn Medicine

Mayo ClinicPCH

Yale University

Image

Image

UTH-logo.jpg

OSU Medical Center logo

INTERNATIONAL VITAMIN CORPORATION

Baptist Health South Florida

Mather Hospital

St. Charles

Cancer Treatment Centers of America

Hilton Head Regional Healthcare Logo

Baptist Memorial Rehabilitation Hospital

Emblem of the United States Department of the Army.svg

HDLogoNew3

Image

The Surgery Center of Beaufort

Image result for georgetown university logo

Image

Endologic

ESCO Logo

Image

University of Minnesota block M and wordmark

University of Massachusetts Amherst seal.png

Monmouth University seal.svg

Mount Royal University Home

WSU logo

Image

Gannon University

University of Nevada, Las Vegas seal.svg

Chamberlain University, College of Nursing and Health Professionals

Dr. David Fetterman
Dr. David FettermanAdvisory Board (Fetterman & Associates, President)
EDUCATION
Ph.D., Stanford University
A.M., Stanford University,
A.M., Stanford University

EXPERIENCE

Professor, Stanford University
Director of Evaluation, School of Medicine, Stanford University

HONORS (selected)

American Educational Research Association Research on Evaluation Distinguished Scholar Award, 2013
American Evaluation Association Advocacy and Use Evaluation Award, 2014
George and Louise Spindler Award, American Anthropological Association and the Council on Anthropology and Education, 1990 (educational anthropology)
Lazarsfield Award for Contributions to Evaluation Theory, American Evaluation Association, 2000
Mensa Education and Research Foundation Award for Excellence, 1990.
Myrdal Award for Cumulative Contributions to Evaluation Practice, American Evaluation Association, 1995
Outstanding Higher Education Professional, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, 2008
Who’s Who in America, 1990, 1995-1996, 1999, 2008-2012
Who’s Who in American Education, 1989 90, 1995-96, 2003
Who’s Who in Science and Engineering, 2010, 2011
Who’s Who in the World, 2011, 2012, 2013

BOOKS (selected)

Fetterman, D.M., Rodriguez-Campos, L., and Zukowski, A. (in press). Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation: Stakeholder Involvement Approaches to Evaluation. New York: Guilford Publications.
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (2015). Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (2013). Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages: Hewlett-Packard’s $15 Million Race Toward Social Justice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fetterman, D.M. (2010). Ethnography: Step by Step (Third Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. and Wandersman, A. (2005). Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice. New York: Guilford Publications. (Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M. (2001). Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Ethnography: Step by Step. (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., Wandersman, A. (Eds.) (1996). Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment and Accountability. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.) (1993). Speaking the Language of Power: Communication, Collaboration, and Advocacy. London, England: Falmer Press. (Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.). (1991) Using Qualitative Methods in Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fetterman, D.M. (1989). Ethnography: Step by Step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications (13th printing).
Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.) (1988). Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education: The Silent Scientific Revolution. New York: Praeger Publications.
Fetterman, D.M. (1988). Excellence and Equality: A Qualitatively Different Perspective on Gifted and Talented Education. New York: State University of New York Press. (Chapter 7 reprinted in Mensa Research Journal.) (Preview.)
Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.) (1987). Perennial Issues in Qualitative Research, Education and Urban Society (Special Topic Edition), 20(1).
Fetterman, D.M. and M.A. Pitman. (Eds.) (1986). Educational Evaluation: Ethnography in Theory, Practice, and Politics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.) (1984). Ethnography in Educational Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

CHAPTERS AND ARTICLES (selected)

Fetterman, D.M. (in press). Empowerment Evaluation. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. and Ravitz, J. (in press). Evaluation Capacity Building. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (in press). Empowerment Evaluation: Linking Theories, Principles, and Concepts to Practical Steps. In Secolsky, C. and Denison, D.B. (eds.) Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.
Fetterman, D.M. (in press). Transformative Empowerment Evaluation and Freireian Pedagogy: Alignment with an Emancipatory Tradition. In Patton, M.Q. (ed.) Pedagogy of Evaluation: The Cpntributions of Paulo Freire to Global Evaluation Thinking and Practice. New Directions for Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fetterman, D.M. (2015). Empowerment Evaluation. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition.
Fetterman, D.M. (2015). Ethnography. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition.
Fetterman, D.M. (2005). Empowerment Evaluation and Action Research: A Convergence of Values, Principles, and Purpose. In Bradbury, H. (ed.) The Handbook of Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mansh, M., White, W., Gee-Tong, L., Lunn, M., Obedin-Maliver, J., Stewart, L., Goldsmith, E., Brenman, S., Tran, E., Wells, M., Fetterman, D.M., Garcia, G. (2015). Sexual and Gender Minority Identity Disclosure During Undergraduate Medical Education: “In the Closet” in Medical School. Academic Medicine, 90(5):634-644.
Wang JY, Lin H, Lewis PY, Fetterman DM, Gesundheit N. (2015). Is a career in medicine the right choice? The impact of a physician shadowing program on undergraduate premedical students. Acad Med. May, 90(5):629-33. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000615
White,W., Brenman, S., Paradis, E., Goldsmith, E.S., Lunn, M.R., Obedin-Maliver, J., Stewart, L., Tran, E., Wells, M., Chamberlain, L.J., Fetterman, D.M., and Garcia, G. (2015). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Patient Care: Medical Students’ Preparedness and Comfort. Teaching and Learning in Medicine: An International Journal. Volume, 27, Issue 3: 254-263
Obedin-Maliver, J., Goldsmith, E.S., Stewart, L., White, W., Tran, E., Brenman, S., Wells,M., Fetterman, D.M., Garcia, G., Lunn, M.R. (2011). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender-Related Content in Undergraduate Medical Education. JAMA, 306(9):971-977.
Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (2015). Empowerment evaluation is a systematic way of thinking: A response to Michael Patton Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment, evaluation capacity building, and accountability. Evaluation and Program Planning 52 (2015) 10–14
Fetterman, D.M., Rodriguez-Campos, L., Wandersman, A., and Goldfarb O’Sullivan, R. (2014). Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation: Building a Strong Conceptual Foundation for Stakeholder Involvement Approaches to Evaluation (A Response to Cousins, Whitmore, and Shulha, 2013), American Journal of Evaluation, 35(1):142-146. DOI: 10.1177/1098214013509875
Fetterman, D.M. (2012). Empowerment evaluation: learning to think like an evaluator. In Alkin, M. (ed.) Evaluation Roots: A Wider Perspective of Theorists’ Views and Influences (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (2011). Empowerment Evaluation and Accreditation Case Examples: California Institute of Integral Studies and Stanford University. In Secolsky, C. and Denison, D.B. (eds.) Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
Fetterman, D.M., Deitz, J., and Gesundheit, N. (2010). Empowerment evaluation: A collaborative approach to evaluating and transforming a medical school curriculum. Academic Medicine, 85(5):813-820.
Fetterman, D.M. (2009). Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: Using a Critical Friend to Improve the Clerkship Experience. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação. Rio je Janeiro, 17(63):197-204.
Fetterman, D. and Wandersman, A. (2007). Empowerment Evaluation: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(2):179-198.
Fetterman, D.M. (2004). Empowerment Evaluation’s Technological Tools of the Trade. Harvard Family Research Project. The Evaluation Exchange, X 3, p. 8-9.
Fetterman, D.M. (2003). Ethnography. In Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A., and Liao, T.F. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (in press). Qualitative Approaches to Evaluating Education. In Burgess, R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Social Science Research. London, England: Falmer Press.
Fetterman, D.M. (2003). Fetterman-House. A Process Use Distinction and a Theory. In Christie, C.A. (ed.) The Practice-Theory Relationship in Evaluation. No. 97, Spring. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fetterman, D.M. (2003). Empowerment Evaluation Strikes a Responsive Chord. In S. Donaldson & Scriven, M. (Eds.) Evaluating social programs and problems: Visions for the new millennium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fetterman, D.M. and Bowman, C. (2001). Experiential Education and Empowerment Evaluation: Mars Rover Educational Program Case Example. Journal of Experiential Education.
Fetterman, D.M. (2002). Web surveys to Digital Movies: Technological Tools of the Trade. Educational Researcher, 31(6):29-37 or http://aera.net
Fetterman, D.M. (2002). Book Review of Qualitative Research: A Personal Skills Approach by Gary D. Shank, Education Review.
Fetterman, D.M. (1999). Reflections on Empowerment Evaluation: Learning from Experience. Canadian Journal for Program Evaluation, Special Issue, pp. 5-37.
Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Teaching in the Virtual Classroom at Stanford University. The Technology Source.
Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Webs of Meaning: Computer and Internet Resources for Educational Research and Instruction. Educational Researcher, 27(3):22-30.
Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Learning with and about technology: A middle school nature area. Meridian, 1(1)
Fetterman, D.M. (1997). Empowerment Evaluation: A Response to Patton and Scriven. Evaluation Practice, 18(3):253-266.
Fetterman, D.M. (1997). A Response to Sechrest’s Review of Empowerment Evaluation. Environment and Behavior, 29(3):427-436.
Fetterman, D.M. (1997). Ethnography. In Bickman, L. and Rog, D. (eds.) Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (1997). Good care includes educational activities. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Saturday, May 31, p. A 11.
Fetterman, D.M. (1997). Empowerment Evaluation and Accreditation in Higher Education. In Chelimsky, E. and Shadish, W. (eds.) Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Resource Book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (1997). Videoconferencing Over the Internet. Qualitative Health Research, 7(1):154-163.
Fetterman, D.M. (1996). Empowerment Evaluation: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. In Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (eds.) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (1996). Conclusion: Reflections on Emergent Themes and Next Steps. In Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S., and Wandersman, A. (eds.) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (1996). Videoconferencing On-Line: Enhancing Communication Over the Internet. Educational Researcher, 25(4)
Fetterman, D.M. (1996). Ethnography in the Virtual Classroom. Practicing Anthropology, 18(3):2, 36-39.
Fetterman, D.M. (1995). Empowerment Evaluation: A Learning Tool for Systemic Change. In Jenlink, P. (ed.), Systemic Change: Touchstones for the Future School Palatine, IL: IRI/Skylight Publishing.
Fetterman, D.M. (1995). In Response to Dr. Daniel Stufflebeam’s: “Empowerment Evaluation, Objectivist Evaluation, and Evaluation Standards: Where the Future of Evaluation Should Not Go and Where It Needs to Go,” Evaluation Practice, June 1995, 16(2):179-199.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Ethnographic Evaluation in Education. In T.Husen and T.N. Postlethwaite, The International Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Gifted and Talented Education Program Evaluation. In Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). The Terman Study. In Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Dennis, M.L., Fetterman, D.M. and Sechrest, L. (1994). Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation Methods in Substance Abuse Research. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17(4):419-427.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Keeping Research on Track. New Directions for Program Evaluation. No. 63, Fall. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 103-105.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Steps of Empowerment Evaluation: From California to Cape Town. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17(3):305-313.
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Empowerment Evaluation. Presidential Address. Evaluation Practice, 15(1):1-15.
Fetterman, D.M. (1993). Empowerment Evaluation (Theme for 1993 Annual Meeting), Evaluation Practice, 14(1):115-117.
Fetterman, D.M. (1993) Evaluate Yourself: Executive Summary. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
Fetterman, D.M. (1992) Investigative Evaluation and Litigation. In N. Smith (Ed.) Varieties of Investigative Evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, No. 56, Winter 1992, pp. 15-28.
Fetterman, D.M. (1993). Confronting a Culture of Violence: South Africa Nears a Critical Juncture. San Jose Mercury, October 3, pp. 1C, 4C.
Fetterman, D.M. (1993). Ethnography and Policy: A Catalytic Combination for Change. In E. Jacob and C. Jordan, Minority Education: Anthropological Perspectives. New Jersey: Ablex.
Fetterman, D.M. (1992). Hevrah: Our Intellectual Community. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 23(4):271-274.
Fetterman, D.M. (1992) Theory in Evaluation: We Think, Therefore We Theorize (An Ethnographer’s Perspective). In Chen, H. and Rossi, P.H. (Eds.) Using Theory to Improve Program and Policy Evaluations. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Fetterman, D.M. (1992) Evaluate Yourself. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
Fetterman, D.M. (1991). Auditing as Institutional Research: A Qualitative Focus. In Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.). Using Qualitative Methods in Institutional Research, New Directions for Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fetterman, D.M. (1991) Qualitative Resource Landmarks. In Fetterman, D.M. (ed.). Using Qualitative Methods in Institutional Research, New Directions for Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fetterman, D.M. (1991). A Walk Through the Wilderness: Learning to Find Your Way. In Shaffir, W.B. and Stebbins, (Eds.) Experiencing Fieldwork: An Inside View of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fetterman, D.M. (1991). Evaluation in Multi-Site and Multi-Focus Projects. Revitalizing Rural America: New Strategies for the Nineties. Georgia Center for Continuing Education. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia.
Fetterman, D.M. (1990). Ethnographic Auditing. In Tierney, W.G. (ed.) Assessing Academic Climates and Cultures, New Directions for Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 68:19-34.
Fetterman, D.M. (1990). Health and Safety Issues: Colleges Must Take Steps to Avert Serious Problems. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 21, A48.
Fetterman, D.M. (1989). Anthropology Can Make a Difference. In Trueba, H., G. Spindler, and Spindler, L. (Eds.) What Do Anthropologists Have to Say About Dropouts? New York, NY: Falmer Press, 1989.
Fetterman, D.M. (1989). Ethnographer as Rhetorician: Multiple Audiences Reflect Multiple Realities. Practicing Anthropology, 11(2):2, 17-18.
Fetterman, D.M. (1988). Stanford Special Review on Health and Safety Phase II: A Report on Allegations. Internal Audit Department. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Fetterman, D.M. (1988). Qualitative Approaches to Evaluating Education. Educational Researcher, 17(8):17-23.
Fetterman, D.M. (1988). Gifted and Talented Education. In Gorton, R.A., Schneider, G.T., and Fisher, J.C. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of School Administration and Supervision. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
Fetterman, D.M. (1987). A Rainbow of Qualitative Approaches and Concerns. In Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.), Perennial Issues in Qualitative Research, Education and Urban Society (Special Topic Edition), 20 (1):3-8.
Fetterman, D.M. (1987). A National Ethnographic Evaluation of the Career Intern Program (an alternative high school program for dropouts). In B. Wulff and S.J. Fiske (ed.) Anthropological Praxis: Translating Knowledge into Action. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1987.
Fetterman, D.M. (1987). Ethnographic Educational Evaluation. In G.D. Spindler (Ed.), Interpretive Ethnography of Education: At Home and Abroad. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 81 -106.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). The Ethnographic Evaluator. In Fetterman, D.M. and Pitman, M.A. (Eds.) Educational Evaluation: Ethnography in Theory, Practice, and Politics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 21-47. Reprinted in E. Eddy and W. Partridge, Applied Anthropology in America, New York: Columbia University Press, 1987, pp. 340-365
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). The Role of Informed Criticism in Scholarly Review. Evaluation and Program Planning, 9:183-4.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). Gifted and Talented Education: A National Test Case in Peoria. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8(2):155-166.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). Conceptual Crossroads: Methods and Ethics in Ethnographic Research. In D.D. Williams, (Ed.) Naturalistic Evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., pp. 23-36.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). Operational Auditing in a Teaching Hospital: A Cultural Approach, Internal Auditor, 43(2):48-54.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). Gifted and Talented Education in the Soviet Union, Gifted Education International, 5(1):180-183.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). Beyond the Status Quo in Ethnographic Educational Evaluation. In D.M. Fetterman and M.A. Pitman (Eds.), Educational Evaluation: Ethnography in Theory, Practice, and Politics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 13-20.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). The Evolution of a Discipline. In D.M. Fetterman and M.A. Pitman (Eds.), Educational Evaluation: Ethnography in Theory, Practice, and Politics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 215-222.
Fetterman, D.M. (1986). Evaluating Organizational Culture in a Teaching Hospital: The Use of Cultural Concepts and Techniques. In K. Sedgwick (Ed.), Association of College and University Auditors. Logan, Utah: Utah State University.
Fetterman, D.M. (1985). Focusing on a Cross-Cultural Lens in Evaluation. Evaluation Research Society Newsletter, Invited special topic article, 9(2):3-5.
Fetterman, D.M. (1984). Doing Ethnographic Educational Evaluation. In D.M. Fetterman (Ed.), Ethnography in Educational Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Fetterman, D.M. (1984). Guilty Knowledge, Dirty Hands, and Other Ethical Dilemmas: The Hazards of Contract Research. Human Organization, 42 (3):214-224. Reprinted in Conner, R.F. (Ed.) Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Vol. 9, 1984. Also reprinted in Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.) Ethnography in Educational Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Fetterman, D.M. (1982). Ibsen’s Baths: Reactivity and Insensitivity (A misapplication of the treatment-control design in a national evaluation). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4 (3):261-279.
Fetterman, D.M. (1982). Ethnography in Educational Research: The Dynamics of Diffusion. Educational Researcher, 11 (3):17-29. Also reprinted in Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.) Ethnography in Educational Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1984.
Fetterman, D.M. (1981). CIP is Hip: A National Ethnographic Evaluation of an Alternative High School Program for Dropouts. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
Fetterman, D.M. (1981). New Perils for the Contract Ethnographer. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 7(1):71-80.
Fetterman, D.M. (1981). Protocol and Publication: Ethical Obligations. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 7(1):82-83.
Fetterman, D.M. (1981). Blaming the Victim: The Problem of Evaluation Design, Federal Involvement, and Reinforcing World Views in Education. Human Organization, 40(1):67-77. Also reprinted in Evaluation Studies Review Annual, 1982, 7:65-75.
Fetterman, D.M. (1980). Ethnographic Techniques in Educational Evaluation: An Illustration. In A. Van Fleet (Ed.), Anthropology of Education: Methods and Applications. Special topic edition of the Journal of Thought, Fall, 15(3):31-48.
Fetterman, D.M. & Alvarez, R.R. (1979). Anthropological Approaches to Evaluating Education: An Ethnographic Guide for Program Evaluation. CA: United Teachers of Santa Clara Press.
Fetterman, D.M. (1976). An Urban Secondary School Ethnography. Storrs, Connecticut: University of Connecticut.

BLOGS (selected)

Fetterman, D.M. (2014) David Fetterman on Google Glass Part I: Redefining Communications. AEA365. American Evaluation Association. http://aea365.org/blog/david-fetterman-on-google-glass-part-i-redefining-communications/ (April 17.)
Fetterman, D.M. (2014) David Fetterman on Google Glass Part II: Using Glass as an Evaluation Tool. AEA365. American Evaluation Association. http://aea365.org/blog/david-fetterman-on-google-glass-part-ii-using-glass-as-an-evaluation-tool/ (April 18.)
Fetterman, D.M. (2013). In These Uncertain Times, Charities Need a Survival Plan. The Chronicle of Philanthropy. March 10. http://philanthropy.com/article/In-These-Uncertain-Times/137741/
Fetterman, D.M. (2013). Surviving the Fiscal Cliff: The one thing every nonprofit should do in the face of federal tax increases and spending cuts. Stanford Social Innovation Review. http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/surviving_the_fiscal_cliff (January).
Fetterman, D.M. (2012). Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages. Stanford Social Innovation Review. http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/empowerment_evaluation_in_the_digital_villages_hewlett_packards_15_million (December)
Fetterman, D.M. (2012). Corporate Philanthropy Tackles the Digital Divide. Stanford Social Innovation Review. http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/corporate_philanthropy_tackles_the_digital_divide (November)

RADIO INTERVIEWS (recent at: http://www.davidfetterman.com/RadioInterviews.htm)

Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), KAZI FM, Houston, Texas, March 29, 2013.
Chronicle of Philanthropy article about evaluation and nonprofit survival (Chronicle), WPFM FM, Washington, D.C. March 25, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), Kathryn Zox Show, March 13, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), Money Matters Network, Host Stu Taylor, January 28, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), WKXL-AM, Concord, New Hampshire, Host Bill Kearney, January 17, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), WPHM-AM Detroit, Host Paul Miller, January 14, 2013.
Empowerment Evaluation in the Digital Villages (book), Business Matters Radio, Host Thomas White, January 14, 2013.

ENCYLOPEDIA (selected): The International Encyclopedia of Education, Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence, and The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION PRESENTATIONS (selected from over 100): American Evaluation Association, American Educational Research Association, American Anthropological Association, Association of American Medical Colleges, and AAMC Western Group on Educational Affairs.

Dr. Ann E. K. Um
Dr. Ann E. K. UmPresident and CEO
EDUCATION

Doctorate Degree, Columbia University
Master’s Degree, Stanford University
Master’s Degree, Columbia University

EXPERIENCE

Harvard Medical School, DFCI, Research Data Manager
Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Data Manager
The University of Texas, Assistant Professor
Harvard University, Harvard Innovation Labs, Experfy, Instructor
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Advisor
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Human Studies Review Board

PUBLICATIONS (selected)

Autonomy Support, Self-Concept, and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM Verlag, 2010.
Motivation and Mathematics Achievement: A Structural Equation Analysis, Saarbrucken. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM Verlag, 2008.
Motivation and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis. Michigan, Ann Arbor: ProQuest, 2006.
Motivation and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis (doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, New York, 2005.

PRESENTATIONS (selected)

Motivation and Mathematics Performance: A Structural Equation Analysis, National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2005.
Comparing Eighth Grade Diagnostic Test Results for Korean and American Students, National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, Illinois, 2003.

Call Us Now At: (301) 800-0038 

Join The 300,000+ Satisfied Customers Today

If You Want To Set Up A Specific Time To Discuss Your Project, Schedule A Free Consultation! 

Contact us now!
Schedule a Free Consultation