AMSTAT Consulting: 19 Years of National Recognition in Evaluation
OUR TEAM’S EXPERTISE
Our clients cite the following reasons for choosing our team:
- We have PhDs from leading universities, such as Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia.
- We include renowned scholars and talented professors with extensive quantitative and qualitative research backgrounds.
- Our analysts have over 100 years of technical experience. Additionally, they are experts in statistical analysis (e.g., t-test, ANOVA, ANCOVA, traditional regression, logistic regression, MANOVA, MANCOVA, factor analysis, cluster analysis, survival analysis, time series analysis, correlation analysis, meta-analysis, and more advanced statistical techniques such as structural equation modeling (SEM), hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), and path analysis).
- Our analysts use various software packages, including SPSS, SAS, Stata, HLM, Mplus, R, SPSS Amos, SPSS Modeler, Azure, JMP, Python, WinBUGS, Minitab, SYSTAT, LISREL, EQS, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, EViews, and many others.
- Our analysts are experts in qualitative analysis software, including NVivo, NUD*IST, HyperResearch, Atlas.ti, and MAXQDA.
- Our analysts use the latest software available today. They can also apply the required technical and specialized statistical techniques and procedures. Thus, we are confident you will be satisfied with our consultants.
- We are more reasonably priced than most other firms. Thus, our fees are pale compared to the savings our help generates for our clients.
- We offer friendly support and ultra-fast turnaround times.
- Over 90% of clients request our assistance more than once, as they are almost universally happy with our different consulting brands.
- Our team has good communication skills so that we can interact with our clients fluently and comfortably.
- We are members in good standing of the Statistical Consulting section of the American Statistical Association.
- We are committed to quality and excellence, reflected in our record of five-star reviews.
OUR CUSTOMERS LOVE US!
CONTACT US FOR FREE CONSULTING
Phone Support: +1 (650) 460-7431
Email: info@amstatisticalconsulting.com
24/7 Chat Support: Immediate assistance via our chat icon in the right corner of our website
Visit Us
2100 Geng Road, Suite 210, Palo Alto, CA 94303
Your confidentiality is our priority. Non-disclosure agreements are available upon request.
Evaluation Services - Program Evaluation and Impact Assessment
We conduct in-depth evaluations to assess program effectiveness, measure outcomes, and identify areas for improvement. Our evaluations are designed to give clients a clear view of their program’s impact, providing insights that enhance effectiveness and inform future strategies.
Evaluation Services - Data Collection and Analysis
We transform data into actionable insights using robust data collection methods and advanced analytical tools. Our services include survey design, qualitative and quantitative analysis, and custom data visualizations that help clients understand trends, challenges, and opportunities in their fields.
Evaluation Services - Policy Analysis and Research
Our team provides thorough policy research and analysis to help guide public and private sector decision-making. From regulatory analysis to policy implementation studies, we equip clients with the knowledge to shape policy and drive change.
Evaluation Services - Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Our CQI services support ongoing improvement efforts, helping clients identify, implement, and measure changes that lead to better program performance and sustainable outcomes.
Evaluation Services - Community and Stakeholder Engagement
Effective engagement is essential to understanding and addressing the needs of diverse communities. We design and facilitate engagement processes that encourage meaningful stakeholder input, ensuring our clients have a complete perspective on the issues they aim to address.
RECENT PROJECTS
Workforce Outcomes
A client from the U.S. Army was interested in understanding how different leadership styles impacted key workforce outcomes, such as subordinate motivation, job satisfaction, and perceived efficiency. They faced challenges in maintaining consistent performance and morale, which led to the need to evaluate the effectiveness of various leadership approaches. To address this issue, we conducted […]
Relative Risk of Lung Cancer
The National Institute of Health funded a research project to address a critical public health concern about lung cancer risk and the intervention of smoking cessation. The study aimed to investigate lung cancer’s relative risk (RR) and its potential variation between the intervention of smoking cessation and control groups over time. The goal was to […]
Chemical Exposure Risks
The EPA and the SC Johnson manufacturer faced a critical challenge: assessing the efficacy and safety of insect repellent products containing Picaridin and PMD (p-Menthane-3,8-diol) for consumer use. They needed reliable data to determine how well these products protected users from mosquito bites and evaluate the potential chemical exposure risks associated with repeated topical application. […]