Relative Risk (RR) of Lung Cancer 

/, Statistics/Relative Risk (RR) of Lung Cancer 

Relative Risk (RR) of Lung Cancer 

The purpose of this study was to compare the difference in relative risk (RR) of lung cancer between the intervention and control groups. The hypothesis was:

H1: The intervention group will have an increase in relative risk (RR) of lung cancer from pre to post while the control group will have no statistically significant change or may actually decrease.

We conducted a repeated measure ANOVA to test the hypothesis for this study. The study cannot conclude that intervention group has an increase in relative risk (RR) of lung cancer from pre to post while the control group has no statistically significant change.

 

By | 2017-09-23T20:07:21+00:00 September 1st, 2017|ANOVA, Statistics|2 Comments

About the Author:

2 Comments

  1. admin June 1, 2017 at 9:27 am - Reply

    Great job!

  2. Craig Tutterow August 15, 2017 at 6:15 pm - Reply

    We enjoyed working with AMSTAT Consulting on this project. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting such as Dr. Ann E.K.Um are bright, goal oriented and highly motivated. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting not only aided us in our final product but also in our understanding of the applications of statistical analysis. The folks at AMSTAT Consulting impressed us. I strongly recommend AMSTAT Consulting to all my collesgues.

Leave A Comment